Feasibility of implementing blended learning in the post-corona period in the curriculum of higher education from the point of view of academic staff members of Arak University

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 depaertment of education. arak university

2 Faculty member of arak university

3 department of education, arak university,

Abstract

The aim of this research was to assess the feasibility of implementing blended learning in the post-coronavirus period in the curriculum of higher education from the perspective of the faculty members of Arak University, and the present research method was descriptive-survey and in terms of purpose, it was applied. The population under study in this research included all faculty members of Arak University, totaling 280 people, and a total of 143 questionnaires were collected using random sampling. A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect the desired information, which included four components of technological facilities, cultural and social facilities, organizational facilities, and educational facilities. To examine the validity of the questionnaire, the CVR index calculation method was used, and the value of 0.92 was obtained for the entire questionnaire. To examine the reliability, the Cronbach's alpha calculation method was used, and a coefficient greater than 0.70 was obtained for all components of this questionnaire, which was confirmed. One-sample t-test was used to analyze the data. The findings of the research indicated that the technological, educational, and cultural and social facilities of Arak University were significantly higher than the desirable level, while the organizational facilities were lower than the desirable level. Based on the results of this research, it can be stated that in order to implement blended learning in Arak University, suitable organizational facilities need to be provided.

Keywords

References

  1. Hernon O, McSharry E, MacLaren I, Dunne R, Carr PJ. The use of educational technology in undergraduate and postgraduate nursing and midwifery education: A scoping review. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing; 2023; 41 (3): 162-71.

 

  1. Abbasi H, Shams Moorkani Gh. Technology growth, Learning shift. Technology Growth journal; 2018; 1 (54): 17-25.

 

  1. Su J, Zhong Y, Chen X. Technology education in early childhood education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments; 2023, 13: 1-4.
  2. Abedini Baltork M, Nili M. Analyzing the role of constructivism as a new learning approach in the textbooks of elementary school. Research in curriculum planning; 2014; 11 (40): 6-17.
  3. Abedini Baltork M. Virtual Teaching and Its Challenges in Corona Era from the Perspective of Mazandaran University Female Faculty Members: A Phenomenological Study. Journal of Pajoheshhaye Tarbiati; 2021; 8 (42): 141-61.
  4. Shantakumari N, Sajith P. Blended learning: The student viewpoint. Ann Med Health Sci Res; 2015; 5 (5): 323–8.
  5. Mei L, Yuhua N, Peng Z, Yi Z. Pedagogy in the information age: Moodle-based blended learning approach. In: IEEE. International Forum on Computer Science-Technology and Applications; 2009, 38–40.
  6. Bakhmat L, Babakina O, Belmaz Y. Assessing online education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of lecturers in Ukraine. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing; 2021, p. 12050.
  7. Trubavina I, Dotsenko S, Naboka O, Chaikovskyi M, Meshko H. Developing digital competence of teachers of Humanitarian disciplines in the conditions of COVID-19 quarantine measures. In: Journal of Physics: Conference series. IOP Publishing; 2021, p. 12052.
  8. Trubavina I, Vorozhbit-Gorbatyuk V, Shtefan M, Kalina K, Dzhus O. From the experience of organizing artistic and productive activities of older preschool children by means of distance education in the conditions of quarantine measures for the spread of COVID-19; 2021.
  9. Burov O, Kiv A, Semerikov S, Kolgatina L. How augment reality helps during the coronavirus pandemic. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings; 2020, Vol. 2731, 3rd International Workshop on … .
  10. Hamaniuk V, Semerikov S, Shramko Y. ICHTML 2020–How learning technology wins coronavirus. In SHS Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences; 2020, p. 1.
  11. Sumarmi B, Irawan LY, Aliman M. E-module in blended learning: Its impact on students’ disaster preparedness and innovation in developing learning media. Int J Instr; 2021, 187‑208.
  12. Bahri A, Idris IS, Hasmunarti M. Blended learning integrated with innovative learning strategy to improve self-regulated learning. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Faculty of Education, Eskisehir Osmangazi University; 2021, p. 779–94.
  13. Tambak S, Hamzah ML, Purwati AA, Irawan Y, Umam MIH. Effectiveness of Blended Learning Model Based on Problem-Based Learning in Islamic Studies Course. Int J Instr; 2022; 15 (2): 775–92.
  14. Suartama IK, Setyosari P, Sulthoni S, Ulfa S. Development of an instructional design model for mobile blended learning in higher education. Int J Emerg Technol Learn; 2019; ‌14 (16): 4.
  15. Zamanian P, Abdollahi M. Feasibility of combined training in the photography field of Payam Noor University of Isfahan and its effectiveness evaluation. Sci Q J Teach Learn Res Bojnord Branch Azad Univ (Internet); 2021; 16 (66):119–40. Available from: https://edu.bojnourd.iau.ir/article_681200.html
  16. Mahdi Moghadam AH, Noorabadi S, Garmabi H, Jafari Kalibar F, Mahdi Moghadam H. Challenges, patterns and strategies for the development of blended learning. New Achiev Humanit Stud; 2022; 47 (5): 14–27.
  17. Zandi B, Masoumi Fard M. Presenting the combined teaching model of Persian language to foreigners. Sci Q Res Sch virtual Learn (Internet); 2022; 9 (3): 63–80. Available from: https://etl.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_8430.html
  18. Abbasi Kasani H, Mehri D, Mahjoub H, Vosoughi A. Factors Affecting the Application of Blended Learning in Higher Education; 2021: 127-157.
  19. Mohammadi, M, Marzooghi R, Salimi Gh, Mansoori S. the effect of blended learning approach on learners success and satisfaction in technical/ vocational education. Studies in learning and instruction; 9 (1): 91-108.
  20. Mansoori S, Salari Koohfini Z, Ghasemali M. A comparison between the effectiveness of E-learning and blended learning in industrial training. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences; 2020; 11 (1): 46-53.
  21. Chen X, Khaskheli A, Raza SA, Hakim F, Khan KA. Factors affecting readiness to diffuse blended learning in Pakistani higher education institutions. Int J Educ Manag; 2022; 36 (6): 1080–95.
  22. Anthony B, Kamaludin A, Romli A, Raffei AFM, Nincarean A/L Eh Phon D, Abdullah A, et al. Exploring the role of blended learning for teaching and learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning: An empirical investigation. Educ Inf Technol; 2019; 24: 3433–66.
  23. Keržič D, Tomaževič N, Aristovnik A, Umek L. Exploring critical factors of the perceived usefulness of blended learning for higher education students. PLoS One; 2019, 14 (11): e0223767.
  24. Morteza SB, Taghi AH, Legend S. Feasibility of using students’ blended learning method from the point of view of primary school administrators and teachers. Res Elem Educ (Internet); 2020; 2 (3): 36–49. Available from: https://reek.cfu.ac.ir/article_1277.html.
  25. Uzzaman MN, Jackson T, Uddin A, Rowa-Dewar N, Chisti MJ, Habib GMM, et al. Continuing professional education for general practitioners on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: feasibility of a blended learning approach in Bangladesh. BMC Fam Pract; 2020; 21: 1–10.
  26. Babadi AAK, Ehraz FY. The feasibility of using blended learning in the curriculum of speech therapy at Tehran university of medical sciences. J Mod Rehabil; 2018; 1 (3): 163–8.
  27. Mohammadi, M., kowsary, M., Naseri Jahromi, R., khademi, S., shadi, S., mozahebiyan, H. Teachers' hybrid competencies: a solution for teaching effectiveness in the post-corona era. Teaching and Learning Research; 2023; 20 (1): 132-143.
  28. Ghasemi, G., Akbari, E. Teacher characteristics and the preferred educational approach [Traditional (Face-to-Face) Teaching, e-learning, blended learning] in the Covid19. Teaching and Learning Research; 2023; 20 (1): 144-161.
  29. Isiaka RM, Adewole KS, Olayemi RT. Implementing mobile learning in Nigeria tertiary educationalsystem–A feasibility study. Int J Sci Adv Technol; 2011, 1 (7): 84–90.
  30. Taffler A. Thied wave. NY: Wiliam Morrow; 2023.
  31. Abedini Baltork M, Salehi Omran E & Kolbadi, N. Feasibility of Mooc-based Curriculum in higher education (Case study: University of Mazandaran). Journal of Research on Management of Teaching in Marine Sciences; 2023.
  32. Mansoori S & Monfared A. Evaluating the Teaching-Learning Process of Virtual Learning based on Tyler’s model in Fars Province Elementary Schools. Technology and Scholarship in Education; 2024; 3 (4): 57-64.
  33. Mansoori S, Yasbolaghi B, & Jaefari F. Teachers' lived experiences of the use of technology in the implementation of secondary school curriculum: a phenomenological study. Research in Teaching; 2023, 11 (4).
  34. Mansoori S, & Farahani R. Lived experience of Arak University faculty members from virtual learning: a phenomenological study. Journal of Research on Management of Teaching in Marine Sciences; 2022.
  35. Karami M & Alipoor Z. Evaluation of the quality of educational software of the elementary school based on the basic principles of Merrill education. Education and evaluation; 2016; 8 (32): 79-91.
  36. Asadian S, Gholizadeh Ahmadabad H, Maehoodi Gh. Feasibility and Pathology of Tablet Entry into Teaching and Learning Process. Research in Teaching; 2018; 6 (2): 49-68.
  37. Mazloom A. M, Mansoori S & Okhovat M. A. Factors influencing the use of E-learning in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences according to interpretative structural model. Medical education and development; 2018; 13 (3): 194-208

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics