Abstract Objective: One of the theories that motivation into a multi-objective model considers, Mayer's theory of personal investment. This theory is a useful framework for evaluating multi-dimensional and hierarchical nature of goal provides the motivation. The aim of this study is to investigate a multi-dimensional and hierarchical structure of achievement goal orientation. Methods: The population consisted of all high school students in Shiraz who were enrolled in school year 91-90. The sample of 850 students (420 boys, 415 girls) was selected using random sampling. All participants completed questionnaires of school motivation. First-order and higher-order models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Finding: Confirmatory factor analysis results indicated that the data with a model of eight first-order factors with four second-order factors are a better fit. Reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha showed that seven factor, task, effort, competition, social power, social concern, praise have an internal consistency. First-order correlation range was 0.26 (Homework - social power and social concerns - praise) to 0.62 (task-effort). Conclusion: The findings of the study provide a strong theoretical structure and a tool for future research in school motivation. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings were discussed.
Talepasand, S. (2020). Testing Multidimensional and Hierarchical Model of School Motivation Questionnaire. Teaching and Learning Research, 15(1), 11-22. doi: 10.22070/tlr.2020.2517
MLA
Siavash Talepasand. "Testing Multidimensional and Hierarchical Model of School Motivation Questionnaire". Teaching and Learning Research, 15, 1, 2020, 11-22. doi: 10.22070/tlr.2020.2517
HARVARD
Talepasand, S. (2020). 'Testing Multidimensional and Hierarchical Model of School Motivation Questionnaire', Teaching and Learning Research, 15(1), pp. 11-22. doi: 10.22070/tlr.2020.2517
VANCOUVER
Talepasand, S. Testing Multidimensional and Hierarchical Model of School Motivation Questionnaire. Teaching and Learning Research, 2020; 15(1): 11-22. doi: 10.22070/tlr.2020.2517